2008年11月16日星期日

Zhou Zhenglong case tomorrow will be the second trial lawyers do not guilty defense

"South China Tiger photo," Zhou Zhenglong author of suspected fraud, illegal possession of ammunition case of second instance will be at 8:30 on the 17th Xunyang Xian in the open trial. It is understood that Beijing lawyer Gu Yang Yushu and Shaanxi lawyer Zhou Zhenglong will defend free of charge for the second trial.



   Continued for nearly a year of the tiger-week event will be renewable waves. People can not help asking, "according to the Hong Kong Standard," How far from the truth? When will the truth behind the scenes in the white world?



   2 large deposit in the first instance verdict of doubt, "Zhou Zhenglong is not a person in combat"



   September 27, 2008, Xunyang Xian, Shaanxi Province People's Court sentenced Zhou Zhenglong decision committing fraud and deception, and illegal possession of ammunition, Combined Punishment, sentenced to two years and six months in prison and fined 2000 yuan .



   It is reported that the first trial Zhou Zhenglong doubt the existence of 2 large: First, Zhou Zhenglong as a primary school education level of farmers, it can take a different point of view, different focal length of the leave as a tiger. In addition, there is an obvious fake tiger as the latter part of the deal with the technical marks, which themselves are not capable Zhou Zhenglong, but Xunyang sub-judice, Zhou Zhenglong has taken on a whole people down.



   Second, it was learned that Zhou Zhenglong the first trial of nearly 100 observers are actually the Xunyang Xian personnel. In order to ensure the smooth Zhou Zhenglong to hear the case, Xunyang people's court hearing in the case before the deployment of well-done, in addition to the three checkpoints set up at the entrance examination to observe the proceedings, the application also had a reporter sit in the scrutiny. A court employee said they were coming to attend the specialized organizations.



   Zhou Zhenglong in the case of the verdicts, many users can not recognized the outcome of the case. Users generally agreed that, "Zhou Zhenglong is not a person in combat."



   The second trial lawyers will do to defend innocent



   There are types of media coverage of the legal system, "technology" according to the Hong Kong Standard low, in fact, as an ordinary farmer, I do not know "PS" what's Zhou Zhenglong "Zuiqing" or "not guilty" of the evidence.



   Chinese Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that "only a confession of the accused and no other evidence that the guilt of the accused shall not," Zhou Zhenglong, despite a sin to get on their own, but if false, "details" I have not even Zhou Zhenglong "I do not know" , The organ is not to go into details about the case, then that Zhou Zhenglong "false on its own" no doubt that the decision has become "water without a source." Zhou Zhenglong thus can not rule out the possibility that there may be other "accomplices" and even he is the "tank top".



   Zhou Zhenglong was the second trial the defense counsel, said Gu Yu-shu, has been given a clear idea of defense, will be in court to defend the innocent Zhou Zhenglong to do. According to Gu Yushu, they have got some new evidence will be presented in court.



   Can open a "tiger as" suspicions



   Chinese Academy of Sciences researcher Fu-chi in his blog listed in 3 points: 1, props - 71 photos of a tiger's head has always been under a large leaf is the props, Zhou Zhenglong did not know the source of the props?



   2, flash - 40 digital photos, the first to use a flash 9, after shooting more than 20. Zhou Zhenglong has been described in the process of shooting is the bright flash of a camera away after the escape, then who is to complete the picture?



   3, take the time - that Zhou Zhenglong October 3, 2007 shooting of wild South China tiger in the mountains, 21 o'clock to 10 o'clock to go home, but that day around 5:00 p.m., at least two groups of 5 or more To see people in the village on the edge of his activities.



   Over whether doubts in the open in the second instance, a cause for concern.

没有评论: