China's diplomacy in Europe should be designated red line
The Chinese Sarkozy provocation of the disciplinary action is foreign to him to draw a red line, so that Europe can not know what issues relating to interfere in China's core interests International Herald Tribune article a few days ago, French President Sarkozy has repeatedly used the so-called Tibet issue provocation of China, China has aroused strong resentment among the people, as a result of Sarkozy insisted on meeting with the Dalai Lama, China-EU summit had to be postponed. But the Chinese to safeguard national dignity of the diplomatic moves, has caused an uproar in Europe, particularly in some of France's "surprise": China's "strong" Chinese "hegemony". Sarkozy let Napoleon worried "Yaoteng not standing up to speak", seems to have forgotten its own history. Think Charles de Gaulle, France at the time the United States to suppress the development of nuclear weapons in an attempt to weaken the autonomy of France's national defense, Mr. Dai Gaoyue as saying that France is that when the "coalition of infantry," on the Charles de Gaulle to withdraw from the NATO response. At the time, France is a big country in the Western hegemony by bullying most countries, and therefore it is also the most understanding of the western camp of the Chinese people do not adhere to national independence and bow to Western pressure on the heart. In 1964, China will soon become a nuclear power, public opinion in the West have a "surprise", the leadership of Charles de Gaulle of France took the lead in the West to break China's diplomatic blockade and establish diplomatic relations with China. Today the leaders of France seems to be no good to forget the scars of pain. U.S. pressure on France's surviving, Sarkozy began in China's national interests, the core part of the "salt" and the Chinese people showed that only dissatisfaction, which in the eyes of Sarkozy has become a "problem", European public opinion on some of the surprising start, and this shows that today's France, Europe is still doing 18, 19 century Asia sleepwalking. France in the history of successful politicians, such as Napoleon, Charles de Gaulle, is a certain humility and respect for the Chinese people in China; On the other hand, a self-righteous in front of the Chinese people, and that he is a politically immature people, and Sarkozy is one such person. He met with the Dalai Lama's move, he not only do not understand China, in fact, he does not know France, succeeding only because of its oral fast, or simply do not know regardless of the country's long-term interests of France. Napoleon had "China the sleeping lion", said. Because Napoleon from the Asia Europe know that sooner or later, the rise of Asia is good for France, which can alleviate the persistent pressure from the United Kingdom. In 1903, Napoleon sold Louisiana to the United States, its purpose is "to create a Britain will sooner or later down the edge of their opponents on the sea." Charles de Gaulle and the West to break the taboo to shake hands with China, the United States to ease its Pressure. Napoleon and de Gaulle are well aware of: multiple checks and balances in the world, France can find a way out, and the rise of China is conducive to world multiple checks and balances. The decline of the overall capacity of the Western strategy At present, France's Sarkozy as from one side of the West reflects the overall decline in the ability of the strategic, long-term immersion in Western leaders, "sugar", the political quality of its governance and the capacity of the world as a whole is declining. Governance capacity in the world is an important national strategy manifestation of national strategic capability, including a strategic culture, strategic thinking and strategic management capacity of three. At present, Bush began his childhood in the West of the country's political has become child's play, such as sea-election presidential election, "Super Girl" and elected leader of the ability to perform more than the actual capacity, reflecting the West's strategy in the culture of "democracy" under the guise of a certain extent, have to Loss of a sense of national crisis. "9.11" incident, although more or less to arouse the awareness of this, but the number of people who think tank school, do not have much experience in actual combat, and accustomed to making indiscreet criticisms of their strategic thinking with a strong "Zhao Kuo "Colors on paper. Some people say China's response to acts of anti-Sarkozy was "tough", in fact, the only Chinese diplomatic should be made to do, with hard and soft policy does not matter. National unity is a matter of principle, which is any of a dignified not allowed to touch the bottom line policies. Diplomatic efforts to grasp the rigid-flexible Play up the China threat theory in the West, leading to the international community some people think that China's diplomacy should be "low-key, moderate," the development of military power to "cautious." Nothing wrong with low-key, but the question is to what extent low. Tibet, Taiwan's sovereignty issue is China's core interests, this is not a breakthrough in a matter of principle on this issue that they should be aware of China's bottom line and principles, which is responsible for the international community. China's foreign to the Western countries should draw a red line, such as the Taiwan issue, China's very clear red line on the United States and therefore not easily make this challenge to move the red line. The Chinese anti-Sarkozy on the disciplinary action is foreign to him to draw a red line and let him know what issues should not be involved in the discussion of China's core interests. At present, and the maturing of China's diplomatic style, there are just soft, just to bring in soft, the pace of efforts to grasp all was well. Mr. Dai Gaole year with the disdain of the United States to make irresponsible remarks on France, is about to have a straight look for the atomic bomb shook hands with China's as simple as the Chinese anti-China act on Sarkozy's reaction, but the basic principles of safeguarding China's core national interests . As long as there is a national self-respect, will do so.